Sports Facility Proposal Reasonableness Review Service

Overview

Management Consulting & Admin Support

Joplin, Missouri, United StatesPosted about 2 months agoDeadline: April 15th, 2026

Fit Score

Settle Intelligence

Settle helps teams find, evaluate, and respond to public RFPs. We continuously surface new opportunities, score them against your company strengths, and draft proposal responses so you can focus on the work that wins business.

SUMMARY

The city of Joplin, Missouri is requesting a third-party review of the assumptions and financial projections within a sports facility proposal to ensure economic feasibility and soundness.

KEY REQUIREMENTS

BUDGET

Estimate

$75,000 – $250,000

CONTRACT DURATION

3 months

TIMELINE

RFP Issued: March 18th, 2026

RFP Due Date @ 10 a.m.: April 15th, 2026

Finalist Interviews (if required): Week of April 27th, 2026

Vendor Selection: May 1st, 2026

Complete Contract: May 13th, 2026

Present Contract to CID Board for Approval: May 20th, 2026

Consultant Commence Work: May 21st, 2026

Final Report Presentation to CID Board: August 19th, 2026

Issuing Agency

City of Joplin

Organization overview and procurement intelligence available on paid plans.

See Issuer Research

DESCRIPTION

The government authority in Joplin, Missouri seeks a vendor to conduct a comprehensive reasonableness review of the proposal for a new sports facility. The selected vendor will analyze the underlying assumptions related to market demand, financial projections, and economic impact to determine if they are realistic, defensible, and sound.

Key responsibilities include assessing the developer’s business plan for the indoor sports complex by validating each projection, especially those related to tournament and local usage fees intended to cover operational costs. The review must include a thorough analysis of revenues, expenditures, and financial balances from similar venues, with close attention to local and national case studies. The vendor is also expected to compare projected rental rates, gate fees, and concessions with comparable facilities and provide benchmarking matrices that summarize key performance indicators.

A draft report based on these findings will be required for presentation to the CID Board, ensuring a clear and data-driven recommendation regarding the proposal's feasibility.

Source attribution

This Settle analysis is based on the issuing organization’s public RFP listing.